By Michael J. Murray, Michael C. Rea
An advent to the Philosophy of Religion presents a large assessment of the subjects that are on the vanguard of dialogue in modern philosophy of faith. popular perspectives and arguments from either ancient and modern authors are mentioned and analyzed. The ebook treats the entire imperative themes within the box, together with the coherence of the divine attributes, theistic and atheistic arguments, religion and cause, faith and ethics, miracles, human freedom and divine windfall, technology and faith, and immortality. additionally it addresses themes of important value that comparable books frequently forget about, together with the argument for atheism from hiddenness, the coherence of the doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation, and the connection among faith and politics. it is going to be a priceless accompaniment to undergraduate and introductory graduate-level classes.
Read or Download An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion (Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy) PDF
Similar christianity books
This publication serves as a guidebook for believers, to rouse their curiosity, supply sensible aid, let them to imagine via immense questions in gentle of Scripture, and get ready them for the best factor of the twenty first century: our new strength to revamp human nature and be sure the bounds of human existence via abortion, cloning, euthanasia, eugenics, and robotics.
One other Landmark ebook by means of Rick Warren. you're not an coincidence. Even ahead of the universe used to be created, God had you in brain, and he deliberate you for his reasons. those reasons will expand a long way past the few years you are going to spend in the world. You have been made to final without end! Self-help books usually recommend that you simply attempt to notice the that means and function of your lifestyles by way of taking a look inside of your self, yet Rick Warren says that's the incorrect position to begin.
The traditional doctrine of adverse theology or apophasis-the try and describe God by means of conversing simply of what can't be acknowledged in regards to the divine perfection and goodness-has taken on new lifestyles within the predicament with language and its limits that preoccupies a lot postmodern philosophy, theology, and similar disciplines.
In notice and Church readers are taken care of to chapters that research the sector of Christian Dogmatics, offering a transparent trajectory within the paintings of John Webster, that strikes from interpretation of 20th-century Protestant theology to doctrinal development. Webster addresses the fashionable traditions of Christian divinity, and the subjects which come to the fore in making experience of those traditions: the character of the Bible and its interpretation; where of Jesus Christ in sleek theological tradition; and the root and form of human business enterprise.
- The Kingdom of the Occult
- The Ethical Challenge of Auschwitz and Hiroshima: Apocalypse or Utopia?
- End Times Prophecy: Ancient Wisdom for Uncertain Times
- 90 Devotions for Kids in Matthew. Life-Changing Values from the Book of Matthew
Extra info for An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion (Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy)
The first way is just to deny that perfect goodness requires impeccability. One reason for denying this is that it is reasonable to think that someone cannot be praiseworthy (or blameworthy for that matter) unless that person can perform both good and evil actions. If someone unavoidably performs an evil action (because she was brainwashed or drugged, for example) she is not morally accountable for her action because she could not have avoided it. The same seems to be true for praiseworthiness: if the reason that you did some good action was that you were under the influence of a drug that made doing the good action unavoidable, then you are not praiseworthy for doing it.
And if that is right, then this first account of God’s aseity implies that either God is impossible or God exists necessarily. For, again, the truth of G1 logically entails the truth of G2, and vice versa; so if G2 is impossible, then G1 is impossible, and if G2 is a necessary truth, then G1 is a necessary truth. Thus, it looks as if it is in principle possible to reason from the mere possibility of God’s existence to the necessity – and therefore actuality – of God’s existence. We shall return to this way of arguing for God’s existence later, in chapter 5.
Maximal power and divine goodness If one is convinced by the example involving Sally, then what it shows us is that putting omnipotence in terms of the number or types of things the omnipotent being can do or bring about is not the most promising strategy for defining omnipotence. To remedy this, we might try characterizing it in terms of the maximal amount of power that a possible being could have. If God had as much power as any being could have, God would at least have maximal power if not omnipotence.