By Elisa Aaltola, John Hadley
Debate in animal ethics wishes reenergizing. so far, philosophers have occupied with a comparatively restricted variety of particular issues when leaving metaphilosophical matters that require pressing recognition mostly unexamined.
This well timed selection of essays brings jointly new conception and significant views on key themes in animal ethics, foregrounding questions in relation to ethical prestige, ethical epistemology and ethical psychology. Is an individualistic process established upon capacities tips to floor the ethical prestige of non-human animals or may still philosophers pursue relational views? What does it suggest to “know” animals and “speak” for them? what's the position of feelings similar to disgust, empathy, and love, in animal ethics and the way does emotion tell the rationalism inherent in analytic animal ethics theory?
The assortment goals to expand the scope of animal ethics, rendering it extra along with vital modern philosophical subject matters and pushing the self-discipline in new directions.
Read Online or Download Animal ethics and philosophy : questioning the orthodoxy PDF
Similar consciousness & thought books
It is a transparent overview of Hume's theories of the self and private identification, together with his recognized Treatise on Human Nature. Pitson offers a severe exploration of his considering, additionally studying the continued relevance of Hume's theories for modern philosophy and bearing on it to his broader reflections on human nature itself.
- In Praise of Desire
- A Second Vindication of Mr Locke
- Chiasms : Merleau-Ponty's notion of flesh
- Controversies and Subjectivity
- Human Consciousness of God in the Book of Job: A Theological and Psychological Commentary
Extra info for Animal ethics and philosophy : questioning the orthodoxy
Now, there remains to be shown that their moral status depends on such properties. First, note that this special sort of value certainly provides some agents with additional reasons and likely generates additional duties of care and assistance. Yet moral individualists would remark, such reasons and duties are merely agent-relative—that is, they bind only the participants in the relationships. My cat makes stronger claims on me than other cats and on other people. , care) that her value warrants and calls for are based on precisely those features of hers on which my obligations to her are based.
Nicholas Agar, Life’s Intrinsic Value. 31. Daniel C. Dennett, Kinds of Minds (New York: Basic Books, 1996), 18. 32. Nicholas Agar, Life’s Intrinsic Value, 62. 33. 61; Val Plumwood, Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason (London: Routledge, 2002), chapter 5; Gary Steiner, Animals and the Moral Community: Mental Life, Moral Status, and Kinship (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009), chapter 4. 34. ” TWO Against Moral Intrinsicalism Nicolas Delon Human beings tend to treat the following animals quite inconsistently.
24. Elliott Sober, “Metaphysical and Epistemological Issues in Modern Darwinian Theory”, in The Cambridge Companion to Darwin, ed. Jonathan Hodge and Gregory Radick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 302–22, 309. 25. Okasha, “Darwinian Metaphysics”, 197. 26. Okasha, “Darwinian Metaphysics”; Kitcher, “Giving Darwin His Due”. 27. Dennett, Darwin’s Dangerous Idea, 63. 28. M. Mameli and L. Bortolotti, “Animal Rights, Animal Minds and Human Mindreading”, Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (2006): 84–89, 86.